<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>

	      <rss version="2.0">
	        <channel>
	          <title>Reason.tv - Topics</title>
	          <link>http://reason.tv/topics</link>
	          <description></description>
	          <managingEditor>editor@reason.tv (reason.tv Editor)</managingEditor>
	          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
	          
<item>
<title>Take Care of Business: Reason Saves Cleveland With Drew Carey, Episode 4</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/reason-saves-cleveland-take-ca</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;After World War II, Cleveland was booming, thanks to its leadership role&amp;nbsp;in heavy industry and a business-friendly climate. Today, the city&amp;rsquo;s high taxes and onerous regulatory demands make it nearly impossible for new businesses to set up shop while choking the life out of existing companies. While relatively laissez-faire cities such as Houston are growing even during the current recession, Cleveland remains stuck in a rut. How can city officials make the city a more welcoming place for entrepreneurs to thrive?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Reason Saves Cleveland with Drew Carey&lt;/em&gt; is written and produced by Paul Feine; camera and editing by Roger Richards and Alex Manning; narrated by Nick Gillespie; music by the Cleveland band Cats on Holiday. This is the&amp;nbsp;fourth&amp;nbsp;of six episodes that will air March 15-19, 2010.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approximately 10 minutes long. Scroll down for iPod, HD, and audio versions of this video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#1337a6&quot;&gt;Subscribe to Reason.tv&amp;#39;s YouTube channel&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and receive automatic notification when new videos go live.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1043@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:55:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama's Surprising Jobs Program Success</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/jobs</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;During his first State of the Union address President Obama highlighted the jobs created during his first year in office. And it is clear that the president&amp;#39;s policies are putting Americans back to work--especially bankruptcy attorneys, repo men, and government workers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Written and produced by Ted Balaker. Director of Photography: Alex Manning; Associate Producer: Paul Detrick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approximately 40 seconds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go to &lt;a href=&quot;/&quot;&gt;Reason.tv&lt;/a&gt; for downloadable versions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subscribe to &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;Reason.tv&amp;#39;s YouTube Channel&lt;/a&gt; and get automatic notification when new content goes live!&lt;/p&gt; 		 		 		 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1023@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nick Gillespie on Fox's Cavuto, 12/8/2009, Talking Jobs &amp; Unemployment</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/nick-gillespie-on-neal-cavuto</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;On December 8, 2009, Reason&amp;#39;s Nick Gillespie appeared on the Fox Business Channel&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;Cavuto&lt;/em&gt; to discuss President Barack Obama&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;jobs summit,&amp;quot; stimulus, deficit spending,&amp;nbsp;and related plans to create more employment. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the long run, we&amp;#39;re all dead, said John Maynard Keynes. &amp;quot;But,&amp;quot; asks Gillespie, &amp;quot;how do we pay for our funeral?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch this video at Reason&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;YouTube channel.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">995@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From Poverty to Prosperity: Arnold Kling, Nick Schulz, and Economics 2.0</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/authors-arnold-kling-and-nick</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Reason.tv&amp;#39;s Nick Gillespie talks with economist Arnold Kling and journalist Nick Schulz about their new book, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Poverty-Prosperity-Intangible-Liabilities-Scarcity/dp/1594032505/reasonmagazineA/&quot;&gt;From Poverty to Prosperity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (Encounter), which charts the fantastic increase in overall wealth despite recent economic troubles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Taking a longer view that stretches back decades and even centuries, Kling and Schulz argue that we&amp;#39;ve entered the era of Economics 2.0, in which the key issue is innovation, transformation, and growth, not the divvying up of existing goods and services.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Schulz, the editor of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://american.com&quot;&gt;The American&lt;/a&gt;, and Kling, author also of the new &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/144220124X/reasonmagazineA/&quot;&gt;Unchecked and Unbalanced&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, worry about a politics that is dangerously out of synch with the way the economy actually works.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Approximately 10 minutes. Shot by Dan Hayes and Meredith Bragg; edited by Bragg.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Watch this video at &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;Reason.tv&amp;#39;s YouTube channel&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">976@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nick Gillespie on Fox's Freedom Watch, November 17, 2009</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/nick-gillespie-on-freedom-watc-2</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;Reason.tv&amp;#39;s Nick Gillespie appeared on Fox News&amp;#39; Freedom Watch With Judge Andrew Napolitano to discuss the legality and efficacy of the federal government&amp;#39;s bailout of General Motors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Original airdate: November 17, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch this at Reason.tv&amp;#39;s YouTube site by &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;going here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">967@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:01:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>If We Can Put a Man on the Moon...Then Why Does Government Screw Up Just About Everything Else?</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/authors-william-d-eggers-and-j</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Can-Put-Man-Moon-Government/dp/1422166368/reasonmagazineA/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If We Can Put a Man on The Moon...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(Harvard Business Press), former Reason Foundation privatization analysts William D. Eggers and John O&amp;#39;Leary analyze why large-scale government projects typically go so wrong&amp;mdash;and how to change a culture that almost demands such failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The response to Katrina, the Iraq war, NASA since the moon landing, Boston&amp;#39;s Big Dig&amp;mdash;it isn&amp;#39;t difficult to list examples of utter, often tragic failures in the public sector. The key to avoiding such debacles, say Eggers and O&amp;#39;Leary (who bring a wealth of public and private-sector experience to the material) is to first make sure that government should be doing a given project in the first place. From there, both policymakers and the bureaucrats who will administer a given program need to understand and anticipate all sorts of traps into which they can, and&amp;nbsp;all too&amp;nbsp;often, do fall into.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approximately&amp;nbsp;9 minutes. Interview by Nick Gillespie.&amp;nbsp;Shot and&amp;nbsp;edited by Meredith Bragg.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To watch on YouTube,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;go here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For embed code and downloadable versions, scroll down.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">973@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Garrett Peck On &quot;The Prohibition Hangover: Alcohol in America from Demon Rum to Cult Cabernet&quot; </title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/author-garrett-peck-on-the-pro</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;Reason.tv&amp;#39;s Nick Gillespie sat down with Garrett Peck, author of the new history &lt;em&gt;The Prohibition Hangover: Alcohol in America From Demon Rum to Cult Cabernet &lt;/em&gt;(Rutgers University Press).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A wide-ranging social history that begins with the end of Prohibition and runs up to the current craze over great&amp;nbsp;domestic wines and small-batch spirits, &lt;em&gt;The Prohibition Hangover &lt;/em&gt;helps explain why Americans continue to have such an ambivalent relationship toward drinking. Engaging, well-written, and packed with an infinite number of fascinating interviews and historical anecdotes, &lt;em&gt;The Prohibition Hangover&lt;/em&gt; is required reading for anyone interested in understanding the past 80 years of American business and culture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For Peck&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;official site, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prohibitionhangover.com/&quot;&gt;go here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To buy the book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/dp/0813545927/reasonmagazineA/&quot;&gt;go here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Related Reason.tv videos include &lt;a href=&quot;/video/show/beer-an-american-revolution&quot;&gt;Beer: An American Revolution&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and &lt;a href=&quot;/video/show/861.html&quot;&gt;Jerome Tuccille on &amp;quot;Gallo Be Thy Name.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">960@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Would ObamaCare Kill Medical Innovation?</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/medical-innovation</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;As&amp;nbsp;health care reform inches&amp;nbsp;closer to reality, a massively important question becomes&amp;nbsp;even more pressing: Will ObamaCare kill the sorts of medical innovation that makes the United States the leader in&amp;nbsp;bringing new treatments, technology, and procedures to market?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;America is the only industrialized nation that doesn&amp;#39;t have a national health plan,&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;says Rep.&amp;nbsp;Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), former Gov. Howard Dean (D-Vt.), and countless others who want the United States government to guarantee health coverage to all. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Protesters at a recent rally in downtown Los Angeles demanded universal coverage. They told Reason.tv that America is a cruel land where profits come before people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s disgusting!&amp;quot; said one woman. &amp;quot;There should be no profits in health care!&amp;quot; What about those who argue that profits drive medical innovation? &amp;quot;I think that&amp;#39;s kind of sick,&amp;quot; declared another protester, who wants the&amp;nbsp;U.S. to be more like Canada, where government policy keeps drug prices, and drug company profits, lower than in America. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many regard the profit motive as cruel, but might it actually produce &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10979&quot;&gt;compassionate results&lt;/a&gt;? After all, America has generated vastly more medical innovations than other nations. Included in the long list is the innovation that saved the life of Dave Christensen, construction supervisor, husband, and father. After being diagnosed with cancer, Christensen was lucky enough to be given a then-experimental drug that probably wouldn&amp;#39;t have been developed or brought to market in any other country in the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If America follows the lead of the rest of the world and clamps down on profits in health care, who will make tomorrow&amp;#39;s wonder drugs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Drug companies that take big risks may make big profits,&amp;quot; says Reason.tv&amp;#39;s Nick Gillespie, who hosts the video. &amp;quot;But I say, Good for them. If they&amp;#39;re saving lives, I hope they make a killing.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Would ObamaCare Kill Medical Innovation?&amp;quot; runs about seven minutes.&amp;nbsp;Producer-Writer: Ted Balaker; Producer: Hawk Jensen; Director of Photography: Alex Manning; Associate Producer: Paul Detrick.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Special thanks to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.i2i.org/main/page.php?page_id=1&quot;&gt;Independence Institute&lt;/a&gt; for arranging and underwriting travel to Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scroll down for embed code and downloadable versions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To subscribe to Reason.tv&amp;#39;s YouTube channel, go &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">958@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UPS Vs. FEDEX: Ultimate Whiteboard Remix</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/whiteboard</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;You may have heard the UPS is in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iKsTg5CXg4CMfWCfwupmDrcmzBYAD9BJPESO0&quot;&gt;quite the fight&lt;/a&gt; with FEDEX. Though both are package-delivery companies, they&amp;#39;re governed by totally different federal labor rules. As a result, UPS&amp;#39;s workforce is much more heavily unionized than FEDEX&amp;#39;s&amp;mdash;and more than twice as expensive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So now UPS is trying to get FEDEX reclassified under federal law as a way of&amp;nbsp;screwing a competitor.&amp;nbsp;That&amp;#39;s horrendous, but it also makes a sick kind of business sense. And it also reveals the real villain:&amp;nbsp;A government that is big enough to absolutely, positively guarantee it can screw any business. Overnight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;UPS Vs. FEDEX&amp;quot; was produced by Meredith Bragg and Nick Gillespie (who also hosts). Approximately two minutes long.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This video is based on &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/archives/2009/09/28/using-unions-as-weapons&quot;&gt;Using Unions as Weapons&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;quot; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercatus.org/PeopleDetails.aspx?id=17018&quot;&gt;Veronique de Rugy&lt;/a&gt;, which appeared in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/issues/october-2009&quot;&gt;October 2009&lt;/a&gt; print edition of &lt;em&gt;Reason&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scroll down for downloadable versions. This video is also available at Reason.tv&amp;#39;s YouTube channel. &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/reasontv&quot;&gt;Subscribe now&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">942@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>John Mackey's Conscious Capitalism: Full Interview Version</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/john-mackey-full-interview</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;This is the full version of an hour-long conversation with Mackey. For an abridged, five-minute version,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/video/show/915&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;go here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When he started his first organic food store in Austin, Texas in 1978, Whole Foods Market CEO and co-founder &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mackey_(businessman)&quot;&gt;John Mackey&lt;/a&gt; had no idea that he would eventually usher in not just a revolution in how we shop but what we buy. If you dig being able to buy dozens of types of once-exotic apples, or cheese, or wine, or soaps, or countless other items,&amp;nbsp;you can thank Mackey in part for helping to create cathedrals of commerce that have vastly enriched our day-to-day lives and vastly expanded our palates. (Full disclosure: Mackey has contributed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.org&quot;&gt;Reason Foundation&lt;/a&gt;, the nonprofit that publishes this website.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In August, Mackey became one of the most controversial businessmen in America when he penned &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html&quot;&gt;an op-ed for &lt;em&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; outlining his company&amp;#39;s free-market-oriented health care system and offering eight concrete reforms that would reduce costs and improve access. Noting that health care is not &amp;quot;a right&amp;quot; as that term is properly understood, Mackey forcefully argued that increasing government intervention into health care is precisely the wrong thing to do: &amp;quot;The last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction&amp;mdash;toward less government control and more individual empowerment.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The response from the left to Mackey&amp;#39;s op-ed &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/blog/2009/08/19/a-slightly-biased-roundup-of-t&quot;&gt;was swift&lt;/a&gt;: Advocates of single-payer health care, union activists, and others called for protests at&amp;nbsp;and boycotts of Whole Foods, despite the fact that the company provides affordable and well-regarded coverage to its employees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a cutting-edge entrepreneur who is comfortable quoting astrological signs and Ludwig von Mises, who practices veganism and sells some of the best meat in America, and who chases profits and is an outspoken advocate of charitable giving, Mackey confounds conventional political categories. As an advocate of what he calls &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.wholefoodsmarket.com/blogs/jmackey/&quot;&gt;conscious capitalism&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;quot; Mackey is that rarest of businessman: an articulate and passionate defender of free enterprise and free individuals. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In late September, Mackey sat down with &lt;em&gt;Reason&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#39;s Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie to talk about health care reform, corporate social responsibility (on which Mackey &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/archives/2005/10/01/rethinking-the-social-responsi&quot;&gt;has written for &lt;em&gt;Reason&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;), why government interventions rarely achieve their goals, and how Mackey came to his unstinting belief in free markets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approximately five minutes. Shot by Dan Hayes and Meredith Bragg. Edited by Meredith Bragg.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This is the full version of an hour-long conversation with Mackey. For an abridged, five-minute version,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;/video/show/915&quot;&gt;go here&lt;/a&gt; or click below.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;script src=&quot;/embed/video.php?id=915&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">918@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>John Mackey's Conscious Capitalism: Abridged Version</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/john-mackey-interview</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;When he started his first organic food store in Austin, Texas in 1978, Whole Foods Market CEO and co-founder &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mackey_(businessman)&quot;&gt;John Mackey&lt;/a&gt; had no idea that he would eventually usher in not just a revolution in how we shop but what we buy. If you dig being able to buy dozens of types of once-exotic apples, or cheese, or wine, or soaps, or countless other items,&amp;nbsp;you can thank Mackey in part for helping to create cathedrals of commerce that have vastly enriched our day-to-day lives and vastly expanded our palates. (Full disclosure: Mackey has contributed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.org&quot;&gt;Reason Foundation&lt;/a&gt;, the nonprofit that publishes this website.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In August, Mackey became one of the most controversial businessmen in America when he penned &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html&quot;&gt;an op-ed for &lt;em&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; outlining his company&amp;#39;s free-market-oriented health care system and offering eight concrete reforms that would reduce costs and improve access. Noting that health care is not &amp;quot;a right&amp;quot; as that term is properly understood, Mackey forcefully argued that increasing government intervention into health care is precisely the wrong thing to do: &amp;quot;The last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction&amp;mdash;toward less government control and more individual empowerment.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The response from the left to Mackey&amp;#39;s op-ed &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/blog/2009/08/19/a-slightly-biased-roundup-of-t&quot;&gt;was swift&lt;/a&gt;: Advocates of single-payer health care, union activists, and others called for protests at&amp;nbsp;and boycotts of Whole Foods, despite the fact that the company provides affordable and well-regarded coverage to its employees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a cutting-edge entrepreneur who is comfortable quoting astrological signs and Ludwig von Mises, who practices veganism and sells some of the best meat in America, and who chases profits and is an outspoken advocate of charitable giving, Mackey confounds conventional political categories. As an advocate of what he calls &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.wholefoodsmarket.com/blogs/jmackey/&quot;&gt;conscious capitalism&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;quot; Mackey is that rarest of businessman: an articulate and passionate defender of free enterprise and free individuals. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In late September, Mackey sat down with &lt;em&gt;Reason&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#39;s Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie to talk about health care reform, corporate social responsibility (on which Mackey &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/archives/2005/10/01/rethinking-the-social-responsi&quot;&gt;has written for &lt;em&gt;Reason&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;), why government interventions rarely achieve their goals, and how Mackey came to his unstinting belief in free markets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approximately five minutes. Shot by Dan Hayes and Meredith Bragg. Edited by Meredith Bragg.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This is an abridged version of an hour-long conversation with Mackey. For the full interview and downloadable versions,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;/video/show/918&quot;&gt;go here&lt;/a&gt; or click below.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;script src=&quot;/embed/video.php?id=918&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">915@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Overstock.com's Patrick Byrne on Internet Sales Taxes, Naked Short-Selling &amp; Regulatory Capture</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/overstockcoms-patrick-byrne-on</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;Reason.tv&amp;#39;s Nick Gillespie sat down recently with Patrick Byrne, the CEO of &lt;a href=&quot;http://overstock.com&quot;&gt;Overstock.com&lt;/a&gt;, the online retailer famous for sexy ads (&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s all about the O&amp;quot;), low, low prices, and hyperattentive customer service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Born in 1962 and now living in Utah, Byrne holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from Stanford and serves as the co-chair (with Rose Friedman) of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.friedmanfoundation.org/about/ShowBoardMembers.do&quot;&gt;Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice&lt;/a&gt;. He is the former manager of Blackhawk Investment, a cancer survivor, and a black belt in tae kwon do.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An outspoken critic of&amp;nbsp;online sales taxes, Byrne is a self-declared libertarian who champions short-selling while adamantly opposing the more-controversial practice of&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;naked&amp;quot; short-selling. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From his journalistic perch at the blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deepcapture.com/&quot;&gt;Deep Capture&lt;/a&gt;, he and his colleagues regularly chart the ways in which regulators routinely stifle innovation and maintain a status quo that favors connected firms at the cost of competitors and consumers alike.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Raised in New Hampshire, Byrne describes himself as a former &amp;quot;Yankee Republican&amp;quot; who has never felt comfortable with&amp;nbsp;anti-market Democrats and&amp;nbsp;no longer recognizes the GOP as the party of small government and individual liberty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this 10-minute interview, Byrne explains why school choice is the key issue of our day, how bad regulations contributed to the current economic crisis, and why &amp;quot;the government should pave the roads, run the Post Office, and stay off my porch.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Filmed by Dan Hayes and edited by Meredith Bragg.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scroll down for embed code and downloadable versions.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">812@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dan Pallotta: Making Charity Pay</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/dan-pallotta-making-charity-pa</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As the creator of memorable and successful charity events such as the California AIDSRide, in which participants biked 575-miles from San Francisco to Los Angeles over seven days, and the Breast Cancer 3-Day Walk, in which participants covered 55 miles over several days, Dan Pallotta has long been recognized as a trailblazer in philanthropic circles. He has raised hundreds of millions of dollars for various causes and brought huge amounts of publicity to any number of issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In his groundbreaking new book, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Uncharitable-Restraints-Nonprofits-Contemporary-Perspectives/dp/1584657235/reasonmagazineA/&quot;&gt;Uncharitable: How Restraints on Nonprofits Undermine Their Potential&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; , Pallotta makes the case that the nonprofit sector needs to be deregulated so that it can directly harness the energy of capitalism and the profit motive in pursuit of philanthropy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approximately nine minutes, this interview was conducted by Reason Foundation President David Nott and filmed and edited by Alex Manning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For audio podcast, &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/podcast/show/132052.html&quot;&gt;go here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information on Pallotta, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.danpallotta.com/index.php&quot;&gt;visit his website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">714@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bailing Out the Big Three</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/bailing-out-the-big-three</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;2008 was an apocalyptic year for the American car industry, with sales of Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler cars all falling by 25 percent. Supporters of the Big Three automakers argue that the government needs to provide Detroit with at least $50 billion in taxpayer money in order to save the American car industry, on top of the billions of federally subsidized loans they&amp;#39;ve already received. President Barack Obama agrees, having attacked John McCain during last year&amp;#39;s presidential campaign for opposing a bailout of Detroit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But while many commenters and union advocates paint Detroit&amp;#39;s economic troubles as a consequence of the financial crisis, necessitating its inclusion in the bailout sweepstakes, the financial troubles of the Big Three long predated the current mess. Indeed, in 2007, GM sold more cars and trucks than Toyota. Yet Toyota made almost $2,000 per vehicle while GM lost more than $1,000. So why does the United Auto Workers union and President Obama want taxpayers to reward Detroit&amp;mdash;and punish her competitors&amp;mdash;for making unprofitable cars?&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">687@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama's New New Deal</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/obamas-new-new-deal</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;Nobel laureate economist and &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; columnist Paul&amp;nbsp;Krugman says&amp;nbsp;he wants President-elect Barack Obama to enact &amp;quot;something like a new New Deal.&amp;quot; Historian Douglas Brinkley has&amp;nbsp;said that Obama could come&amp;nbsp;to office with a &amp;quot;sweeping legislative agenda which will be Johnson-like or New Deal-like.&amp;quot; An aide close to Obama told &lt;em&gt;New York&lt;/em&gt; magazine that &amp;quot;A lot of people around Barack are reading books about FDR&amp;#39;s first hundred days.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the cusp of a deep economic recession, and with a staggering amount of bailout money being offered to struggling industries, pundits and political advisers are advocating that the incoming Obama administration construct a&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;new &lt;/em&gt;New Deal.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But is the popular narrative about the &lt;em&gt;old &lt;/em&gt;New Deal&amp;mdash;that&amp;nbsp;Keynesian economics and top-down planning&amp;nbsp;rescued America from the Great Depression&amp;mdash;accurate? &lt;strong&gt;Reason.tv&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;#39;s Michael C. Moynihan talks to UCLA economist Lee Ohanian,&amp;nbsp;who argues in work written with colleague Harold Cole, that the New Deal&amp;#39;s massive intervention into the economy actually &lt;em&gt;prolonged&lt;/em&gt; the economic crisis by seven years.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Obama&amp;#39;s New New Deal&amp;quot; is written and produced by Michael C. Moynihan. Director of Photography is Dan Hayes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Podcast available &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/podcast/show/130596.html&quot;&gt;here. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">627@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Just Can't Quit</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/just-cant-quit-1</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;California became the first state to ban smoking in bars a decade ago. Since then, smoking bans&amp;nbsp;in bars, restaurants, bowling alleys, universities, you name it, have flourished.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But there was a time when Americans would have been outraged at the idea of politicians telling business owners how to run their own bars. Today, most gladly allow nanny state cops to snuff out smoking in bars, cars, beaches, stage plays&amp;mdash;almost anywhere. Years ago comedian Dennis Leary quipped, &amp;ldquo;What&amp;rsquo;s the law now, you can only smoke in your apartment, under a blanket with all the lights out?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems like plenty of politicians would love to ban that too, but they could never ban smoking in private homes...or could they?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Recently, the Bay Area city of Belmont passed a law that targets people who smoke &lt;em&gt;in their own homes&lt;/em&gt;. &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m pretty sure I still live in America,&amp;rdquo; says smoker and Belmont resident David Scott.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But if Scott lights up once the new law takes effect in January, he might just get a visit from a police officer. The mayor who championed the new law declares, &amp;ldquo;It is our responsibility to take care of everyone!&amp;rsquo; and a pro-ban councilmember who worries about smoke wafting into neighboring units compares smoking in an apartment to shooting a gun through the wall.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Smoking is one of the worst things you can do to your body, but how dangerous is second-hand smoke? Are banners saving lives or battering science? Are they progressive champions or plunderers of property rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Citing the proliferation of privately enforced bans, &lt;strong&gt;reason.tv &lt;/strong&gt;host Nick Gillespie says, &amp;ldquo;I actually like smoking bans; I just don&amp;rsquo;t like it when the &lt;em&gt;government&lt;/em&gt; does the banning.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Indeed, smoking bans have already set the stage for all sorts of&amp;nbsp;other nanny state policies to save us from ourselves. The nannies have already barged through our front doors. Just how much farther will the banners go?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Just Can&amp;#39;t Quit&amp;quot; was written and produced by Ted Balaker.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a bonus double-feature, click below to see 2002&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;Talking Butts: A Smoking Documentary&lt;/em&gt;, which was made with the help of &lt;strong&gt;reason&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;#39;s&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;Paul Feine, Jesse Walker, Jacob Sullum, and Charles Paul Freund. The 25-minute film explores why people smoke and why attempts to regulate and punish smokers have unintended consequences. And it features a cameo by filmmaker John Waters that is absolutely unforgettable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.tv./video/show/179.html&quot;&gt;To embed &lt;em&gt;Talking Butts&lt;/em&gt; on your site, go here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;script src=&quot;/embed/video.php?id=179&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">577@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Starbucks vs. the Little Guy</title>
<link>http://reason.tv/video/show/starbucks-vs-the-little-guy</link>
<description> &lt;p&gt;Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz recently announced that the company would close 600 of its approximately 12,000 American stores in the coming year, sending 12,000 managers and baristas to the unemployment line. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But as Starbucks contracts, many independent coffee shops are growing, beating the coffee giant in an upscale market it helped to create. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As anti-corporate crusaders are now discovering, instead of advocating for legal prohibitions on chain stores or attempting to zone the offending businesses off of Main Street USA, mom-and-pop shops can successfully combat the coffee behemoth by using old-fashioned market competition. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;reason.tv&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;#39;s Michael C. Moynihan and Dan Hayes investigate.&lt;/p&gt; 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">515@http://reason.tv</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate><author>dan.hayes@reason.org (Dan Hayes)</author>
</item>
	        </channel>
	      </rss>
  		